by The rivalry between the Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens match player stats showcased another intense chapter when these AFC North titans clashed recently.
The Ravens thoroughly dominated this matchup, securing a convincing 28-14 victory that left Pittsburgh searching for answers.
This wasn’t just another game—it represented a significant power shift in one of football’s most physical rivalries.
What made this contest particularly noteworthy was the stark contrast in offensive approaches.
While Baltimore leaned heavily on their devastating ground game, Pittsburgh struggled to establish any rushing attack whatsoever, forcing them to rely almost exclusively on the passing abilities of Russell Wilson.
The Ravens’ balanced offensive assault, spearheaded by Derrick Henry’s monster performance, proved too much for the Steelers to handle.
Steelers Vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
For football fans interested in understanding the dynamics of this matchup, this comprehensive breakdown examines every facet of the game.
From individual player performances to tactical decisions, we’ll explore how the Ravens built their lead, how the Steelers attempted to respond, and what these outcomes mean for both teams moving forward in their divisional race.
Final Score
The final score tells a story of Ravens dominance bookended by a brief Steelers resurgence:
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steelers | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 7 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 28 |
The Ravens built their lead methodically through the first half, scoring touchdowns in both the first and second quarters while completely shutting down the Steelers’ offense. Pittsburgh showed signs of life in the third quarter with two touchdown drives, but Baltimore responded with a score of their own to maintain a comfortable margin. The scoreless fourth quarter reflected the Ravens’ focus on ball control and clock management to secure their victory.
Steelers Player Stats
Passing
| Player | Completions/Attempts | Yards | Touchdowns | Interceptions | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell Wilson | 20/29 | 270 | 2 | 0 | 121.3 |
| Justin Fields | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
Despite the loss, Russell Wilson delivered an efficient performance, completing nearly 69% of his passes for 270 yards and two touchdowns without throwing an interception. His 121.3 passer rating indicates high-quality quarterback play that gave the Steelers opportunities to stay competitive. Justin Fields made a brief appearance but didn’t impact the game with his lone incomplete pass.
Rushing and Receiving
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Rushing TDs | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Receiving TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Najee Harris | 6 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 0 |
| Jaylen Warren | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 0 |
| Russell Wilson | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pat Freiermuth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Darnell Washington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| George Pickens | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 87 | 1 |
| Van Jefferson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 1 |
| Mike Williams | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 37 | 0 |
| Calvin Austin III | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 0 |
The rushing attack was nearly non-existent for Pittsburgh, with lead back Najee Harris managing just 17 yards on 6 carries. This one-dimensional approach made the Steelers predictable in key situations.
In the passing game, George Pickens emerged as Wilson’s primary target, hauling in 5 receptions for 87 yards and a touchdown. Van Jefferson made the most of his limited opportunities with a touchdown among his 2 catches, while Mike Williams contributed a significant 37-yard reception that helped spark the Steelers’ third-quarter surge.
Defense
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Sacks | Tackles for Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elandon Roberts | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Queen | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Cameron Heyward | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Minkah Fitzpatrick | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Joey Porter Jr. | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Linebacker Elandon Roberts led the defensive effort with 14 total tackles, often serving as the last line of defense against Derrick Henry’s punishing runs. Patrick Queen and Cameron Heyward each contributed 10 tackles, with Heyward adding 2 tackles for loss that momentarily disrupted Baltimore’s rhythm.
Safety Minkah Fitzpatrick recorded 9 tackles while rookie cornerback Joey Porter Jr. registered 6 solo tackles, demonstrating solid open-field tackling ability. However, the complete absence of sacks highlights one reason why Lamar Jackson operated so comfortably throughout the contest.
Kicking and Punting
| Player | Field Goals | Extra Points |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Boswell | 0/0 | 2/2 |
| Player | Punts | Yards | Inside 20 | Longest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corliss Waitman | 5 | 257 | 5 | 60 |
Kicker Chris Boswell had limited opportunities, attempting no field goals while converting both extra point attempts. Punter Corliss Waitman was a bright spot for Pittsburgh, averaging over 51 yards per punt and placing all 5 of his attempts inside the Ravens’ 20-yard line, helping the Steelers maintain some field position advantage despite their offensive struggles.
Baltimore Ravens Player Stats
Passing
| Player | Completions/Attempts | Yards | Touchdowns | Interceptions | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamar Jackson | 16/21 | 175 | 2 | 0 | 132 |
Lamar Jackson epitomized efficiency, completing 76% of his throws for 175 yards and 2 touchdowns without an interception. His stellar 132 passer rating reflects his precision and decision-making. While these numbers might not appear overwhelming, they represent Jackson’s ability to complement the running game with timely, accurate passes that kept drives alive and finished possessions with touchdowns.
Rushing and Receiving
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Rushing TDs | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Receiving TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 26 | 186 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lamar Jackson | 15 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justice Hill | 6 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 1 |
| Mark Andrews | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 0 |
| Isaiah Likely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 53 | 0 |
| Rashod Bateman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 1 |
The story of the game was Derrick Henry’s dominance, as he rumbled for 186 yards and 2 touchdowns on 26 carries, averaging an impressive 7.15 yards per attempt. His punishing running style wore down the Steelers’ defense throughout the game. Jackson complemented this with 81 rushing yards of his own, creating a two-headed monster that Pittsburgh simply couldn’t contain.
In the passing game, tight end Isaiah Likely led receivers with 53 yards on 3 catches, while Rashod Bateman turned one of his 2 receptions into a touchdown. Running back Justice Hill served as a safety valve, catching 4 passes including a touchdown reception that helped build Baltimore’s early lead.
Defense
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Sacks | Tackles for Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ar’Darius Washington | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Roquan Smith | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Nnamdi Madubuike | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Marlon Humphrey | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Pierce | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Safety Ar’Darius Washington led the Ravens with 7 tackles, while linebacker Roquan Smith added 5 tackles and provided crucial leadership in defensive alignments. The defensive front made significant contributions, with Nnamdi Madubuike recording 2 sacks at critical moments and Michael Pierce adding another. Unlike their counterparts, Baltimore’s defense generated consistent pressure on the quarterback, resulting in 3 total sacks that disrupted Pittsburgh’s timing.
Kicking and Punting
| Player | Field Goals | Extra Points |
|---|---|---|
| Justin Tucker | 0/0 | 4/4 |
| Player | Punts | Yards | Inside 20 | Longest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Stout | 4 | 183 | 1 | 49 |
Kicker Justin Tucker converted all 4 extra point attempts while not being called upon for any field goal tries. Punter Jordan Stout averaged nearly 46 yards on his 4 punts, including one placed inside the Steelers’ 20-yard line. His solid performance helped maintain field position throughout the contest.
Game Summary & Key Highlights
Ravens’ Dominant First Half
The Ravens established control early and never relinquished it, building a commanding 21-0 halftime lead:
- Ball control offense created multiple sustained drives exceeding 5 minutes each
- Derrick Henry’s early success forced the Steelers to commit additional defenders to stopping the run
- Play-action passing became devastatingly effective once Pittsburgh focused on stopping Henry
- Defensive discipline limited Russell Wilson’s effectiveness by taking away his first read
- Third-down efficiency (6-for-7 in the first half) allowed Baltimore to maintain possession and wear down the Steelers’ defense
This first-half performance essentially decided the game’s outcome, despite Pittsburgh’s subsequent efforts to mount a comeback.
Steelers’ Comeback Attempt
After a dismal first half, Pittsburgh showed signs of life in the third quarter:
- Increased tempo caught Baltimore’s defense off-guard initially
- Downfield passing to George Pickens and Van Jefferson created chunk plays
- Defensive adjustments briefly contained Baltimore’s rushing attack
- 14 unanswered points cut the deficit to just seven points midway through the third quarter
- Momentum shift briefly energized the home crowd and put pressure on the Ravens
However, this resurgence proved short-lived as Baltimore responded with a touchdown drive of their own to reestablish a comfortable 14-point cushion.
Derrick Henry’s Special Night
The Ravens’ star running back delivered a performance for the record books:
- Consistent production throughout all four quarters with no significant drop-off in effectiveness
- Tackle-breaking ability turned what should have been short gains into substantial chunks of yardage
- Vision and patience to find cutback lanes against Pittsburgh’s aggressive defensive front
- Ball security remained flawless despite heavy workload and physical punishment
- Game-sealing runs in the fourth quarter helped drain the clock and preserve the lead
Henry’s dominance represented the clearest difference between these division rivals, as Pittsburgh had no answer for his combination of power, speed, and endurance.
The Best of the Best
Several defensive standouts made their presence felt beyond the basic statistics:
- Nnamdi Madubuike’s third-down sacks killed promising Steelers drives at crucial moments
- Roquan Smith’s communication ensured Baltimore’s defense remained properly aligned against Pittsburgh’s formations
- Marlon Humphrey’s coverage limited George Pickens’ effectiveness outside of one scoring drive
- Elandon Roberts’ valiant effort for Pittsburgh often came after significant gains had already been surrendered
- Cameron Heyward’s disruptiveness occasionally created backfield penetration that momentarily slowed Baltimore’s attack
The contrast between Baltimore’s ability to generate pressure and Pittsburgh’s inability to do the same proved decisive in determining the final outcome.
Never-Ending Efforts
Despite the final score, several aspects of Pittsburgh’s performance merit recognition:
- Russell Wilson’s efficiency (20/29, 270 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs) gave the Steelers opportunities to compete
- George Pickens’ big-play ability (5 catches, 87 yards, 1 TD) provided a consistent downfield threat
- Corliss Waitman’s punting (5 punts, 51.4 yard average, all inside the 20) helped field position
- Third-quarter adjustments demonstrated the coaching staff’s ability to make meaningful changes
- Defensive effort remained strong despite spending nearly 38 minutes on the field
However, these contributions couldn’t overcome the complete absence of a rushing attack (29 total yards) that made Pittsburgh’s offense predictable in key situations.
FAQs on Steelers Vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats:
Who was the standout player of the match?
Derrick Henry unquestionably earned standout status with his dominant 186-yard, 2-touchdown performance. Averaging over 7 yards per carry against a traditionally stout Steelers defense, Henry’s punishing running style set the tone early and helped seal the victory late. His ability to break tackles consistently wore down Pittsburgh’s front seven and opened up play-action opportunities for Lamar Jackson. This performance ranks among the most impressive individual rushing displays in the history of this storied rivalry.
How did the Steelers perform in the passing game?
Despite the loss, the Steelers’ passing attack showed considerable promise. Russell Wilson completed 69% of his passes for 270 yards and 2 touchdowns without an interception, earning an impressive 121.3 passer rating. George Pickens emerged as his favorite target with 5 catches for 87 yards and a touchdown, while Van Jefferson added another scoring reception. However, this aerial success was undermined by a complete lack of balance, as Pittsburgh’s inability to establish any rushing threat (29 total yards) made them predictable in key situations and ultimately prevented a successful comeback.
What were the key statistics that determined the game’s outcome?
Several statistical disparities tell the story of Baltimore’s victory:
- Rushing yards: Ravens 267, Steelers 29 – This massive 238-yard differential allowed Baltimore to control the clock and wear down Pittsburgh’s defense
- Time of possession: Ravens 37:52, Steelers 22:08 – Baltimore’s ball control limited Pittsburgh’s offensive opportunities
- Third-down efficiency: Ravens 67% (8/12), Steelers 38% (5/13) – The Ravens’ success in converting third downs helped maintain drives
- Yards per play: Ravens 6.1, Steelers 5.2 – Baltimore’s greater efficiency, particularly in the running game, accumulated throughout the contest
- Sacks: Ravens 3, Steelers 0 – Baltimore’s pass rush created pressure at key moments, while Jackson had time to operate effectively
These numbers highlight how Baltimore’s physical dominance and offensive balance created advantages in virtually every phase of the game.
What adjustments did the Steelers make at halftime?
After a scoreless first half, Pittsburgh implemented several effective adjustments:
- Increased offensive tempo with more no-huddle looks to prevent Baltimore from substituting defensive personnel
- More aggressive downfield passing instead of settling for shorter completions
- Greater focus on George Pickens as the primary receiving threat
- Defensive alignment shifts to better contain Lamar Jackson’s scrambling ability
- More disguised blitz packages to create occasional pressure
These changes helped Pittsburgh score 14 third-quarter points but ultimately weren’t sufficient to overcome Baltimore’s lead and counter-adjustments.
What does this performance indicate about Lamar Jackson’s development?
While Jackson’s passing numbers (16/21, 175 yards, 2 TDs) might appear modest, they actually demonstrate his continued evolution as a complete quarterback. His 76% completion percentage and 132 passer rating highlight his improved accuracy and decision-making. Most importantly, Jackson showed the maturity to let the running game lead the offense when it was working effectively, while still delivering precise throws when needed. This balanced approach makes Baltimore increasingly difficult to defend and suggests Jackson has developed into a quarterback who can win games through multiple avenues depending on what the defense presents.
Also Check:
- Dallas Cowboys Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
- Washington Commanders Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
- Minnesota Vikings Vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats
Conclusion
This showdown between the Baltimore Ravens and Pittsburgh Steelers highlighted the current trajectory of both franchises. The Ravens demonstrated why they’re considered legitimate contenders with a complete performance featuring devastating rushing attacks, timely passing, and opportunistic defense. Their balanced offensive approach and ability to control the game’s tempo through Derrick Henry’s punishing runs proved too much for Pittsburgh to handle.
For the Steelers, this defeat exposes concerning weaknesses that must be addressed. While Russell Wilson performed admirably through the air, the complete inability to establish any ground game created a one-dimensional attack that ultimately proved insufficient. Defensively, their front seven’s struggles against the run raise questions about their ability to compete against physical opponents.
The 28-14 final score serves as both a statement for Baltimore and a wake-up call for Pittsburgh. As this storied rivalry continues to evolve, the Ravens currently hold the upper hand, but history suggests the Steelers will make adjustments before their next encounter. For now, Baltimore can celebrate a dominant divisional victory while Pittsburgh returns to the drawing board to address their obvious shortcomings.
